The four honest answers.
Capture at the source. No behavior to change. Every option above tries to change what techs do. Mentat doesn't.
It captures what they already notice, in a minute of talking, and turns it into a priced draft estimate. Training and spiffs get better with it, not replaced by it: attribution finally gives you something fair to spiff.
Five answers, five questions.
| Question | Do nothing | Coaching | Training | Spiffs | Mentat |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Captures found work | No | While coached | No | If closed same-day | Every visit |
| Survives turnover | — | No | No | No | Yes |
| Builds property record | No | No | No | No | Yes |
| Credits the spotter | No | No | No | Closer only | By name |
| Ongoing cost | Hidden | High | Per-session | Per-sale | $29/location + 2.9% recovered |
Does Mentat replace sales training?
No. Training improves conversations. Mentat makes sure what gets noticed becomes an estimate. They compound.
Is there software that does this already?
FSMs record jobs, not observations. Quoting tools price work someone already decided to quote. Mentat covers the step before: capture.
What does it cost to find out if it works?
Nothing for 90 days. No card. If it hasn't paid for itself, walk away and your records stay readable.